- Jul 23, 2012
- 793
- 2,735
Every cheerleading team (or sports team, for that matter) has rivals they love to beat. What do you think, though, when coaches use those rivalries as motivators? I recently had a conversation with some fellow coaches about this and am interested in other opinions.
I think when it comes to college age teams and even senior all-star and high school, it can be a motivator if done in the right way. Older kids can better understand healthy rivalries, in my opinion. But what about coaches of younger teams, or even coaches of older teams who go too far?
When a coach starts to concentrate on beating other squads rather than making their own team the best it can possibly be, I think it can turn friendly rivalries into heated ones and lead to disappointment. If you say during practice, "we need to hit this if you want to beat so and so" or "you need to work harder if you ever want to beat so and so," doesn't that set kids up for disappointment? What if your team goes to competition and hits perfectly, and still gets second? Is that no longer acceptable because you didn't place ahead of aforementioned competitor?
I'd love to hear some thoughts. I coach 12-14 year olds and have seen coaches putting all their focus on beating other teams, often one team in particular, thus creating a bad situation when it doesn't happen. Even worse, it spawns unnecessary hatred and encourages unsportsmanlike comments and actions on the part of the kids they coach, when beforehand, these kids might have been okay with second or third as long as they hit their routine.
Do you think there is a positive way to use rivalries as motivators? Or should coaches stay completely away and focus on hitting a solid routine and letting the chips fall where they may?
I think when it comes to college age teams and even senior all-star and high school, it can be a motivator if done in the right way. Older kids can better understand healthy rivalries, in my opinion. But what about coaches of younger teams, or even coaches of older teams who go too far?
When a coach starts to concentrate on beating other squads rather than making their own team the best it can possibly be, I think it can turn friendly rivalries into heated ones and lead to disappointment. If you say during practice, "we need to hit this if you want to beat so and so" or "you need to work harder if you ever want to beat so and so," doesn't that set kids up for disappointment? What if your team goes to competition and hits perfectly, and still gets second? Is that no longer acceptable because you didn't place ahead of aforementioned competitor?
I'd love to hear some thoughts. I coach 12-14 year olds and have seen coaches putting all their focus on beating other teams, often one team in particular, thus creating a bad situation when it doesn't happen. Even worse, it spawns unnecessary hatred and encourages unsportsmanlike comments and actions on the part of the kids they coach, when beforehand, these kids might have been okay with second or third as long as they hit their routine.
Do you think there is a positive way to use rivalries as motivators? Or should coaches stay completely away and focus on hitting a solid routine and letting the chips fall where they may?