- Feb 10, 2015
- 443
- 1,391
Anti trust by definition prevents predatory business practices by ensuring fair competition exists in an open market economy. While many of you feel these are "hostile takeovers", they are not by definition. Mergers, where companies agree to form a partnership, are far from predatory and Varsity is not by definition a monopoly. It would take me hours to list all of the activewear, warm up, shoe, bow, backpacks, sports bras, uniform, megaphone, and yes even events out there.
Many people in this thread have said, if you don't like Varsity, then just don't use them, attend their events, etc. The point I was trying to make about distance and competitions is that, with the recent Varsity takeover, many gyms have no choice but to attend Varsity events now. I never said any of their takeovers were hostile, but through mergers and takeovers Varsity has slowly whittled down the IEP "choices" to completely non-existent in some areas.
Varsity owns about 95% of the cheer market. It is my opinion that it is a monopoly. So we will just have to agree to disagree on that. Like I said, not all monopolies are illegal. Is the Varsity monopoly legal? Only time will tell. It will be interesting to see how Varsity handles this new company's competition, because it looks like Rebel is very capable of large-scale production. Rebel grew very large, very quickly. They seem to have a very good business plan and an excellent marketing team. They are going to give Varsity a run for their money in the uniform department. Let's see if Varsity tries to retain and win new customers by stepping up their quality of production, customer service, etc... Or if they will simply use their market "might" to squeeze out the competition.