- Dec 15, 2009
- 5,561
- 7,491
I'm not a USAG expert but I do coach at a gymnastics facility. I'll ask some more questions tonight.
Thank you, I am just really curious what they do when they discover more injuries caused my certain skills.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
I'm not a USAG expert but I do coach at a gymnastics facility. I'll ask some more questions tonight.
Thank you, I am just really curious what they do when they discover more injuries caused my certain skills.
I have talked to a USAG coach who trains coaches in the northeast. I asked him this
"Why don't you teach Gymnasts to do standing fulls?"
He told me that it is not worth the risk of injury. He said to teach a properly executed standing full takes a very knowledgeable coach and he doesn't think the majority of coaches can teach a PROPERLY executed standing full.
I also asked him if there are illegal skills in gymnastics. He said that there are things that are illegal but it is different for boys and girls, but that is because they are competing separately. He said that once there are a certain amount of injuries that skills are deemed to be illegal by the USAG. It is NOT voted on by the member organizations. Also, once a skill is performed and there is a catastrophic injury, it is usually banned.
So the USASF is doing things that are considered acceptable by organizations that govern similar sports.
So the changes made (good or bad) were to address 3 major problems.
1. Injuries are increasing in allstar cheerleading and cheerleading has issues getting insured. Hence new tumbling rules.
2. Cheerleading numbers have decreased last year drastically. Changing ages and divisions in theory open up the sport and make it a little bit more attractive to bring in new people (in theory).
3. The image portrayed of allstar cheer in the media is negatively impacting the sport (or so it is believed). Hence the image rules.
How should these problems have been addressed?
Also. Why do we think an ACL tear isn't a major injury? A sprained ankle isn't a major injury. An Acl tear that requires surgery and extensive physical therapy is a major injury.
Sent from my DROID BIONIC using Tapatalk
But if it is generally known by well trained coaches to be a difficult skill to teach then that's all the governing powers needed.
Sent from my DROID BIONIC using Tapatalk
I would say death and paralysis are catastrophic injuries. Anything that takes months to recover from is major.If on a scale of 1-10 death or paralyzation is major, an ACL is at best a 4-5. Yes it sucks, but it is totally recoverable and most athletes can be expected to make a full and complete recovery. Yes it's bad, but not bad enough to ban skills.
Why is the USASF just now deciding to work on this? How long has this been a problem? It was there before this season and they never took any steps. If they haven't taken any steps yet I have little faith they ever will. Instead they will just take skills away.Also. How do we know they wont require that. There needs be a program put in place. You can't just arbitrarily say you're qualified and you're not. Once they put something into effect the skills could come back with proper instruction.
What you're saying is allow people to instruct the skills even if they're not qualified until the usasf puts a true certification on place?
Why wouldnt you remove the instruction until there is a class or whatever to evaluate coaches?
Sent from my DROID BIONIC using Tapatalk