- Dec 14, 2009
- 311
- 124
- Thread starter
- #16
I wonder why they decided to make their eligibility rules around how many championships one has participated in instead of years in school.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
I wonder why they decided to make their eligibility rules around how many championships one has participated in instead of years in school.
I wonder why they decided to make their eligibility rules around how many championships one has participated in instead of years in school.
LOL, I guess I have 5 years, but I don't want them! I can't keep up anymore.
But if you take four years for a bachelors and 2 for a masters, you would only be eligible for that one year of grad school. You can stay in grad school forever, but you are done playing collegiate sports. If I'm a cheerleader and I don't compete I don't lose any of my years. So I could still be 30 and competing if I choose to do so later. I think if they are trying to look legitimate to NCAA or whoever the eligibility rule needs to be for years, not championships.
But if you take four years for a bachelors and 2 for a masters, you would only be eligible for that one year of grad school. You can stay in grad school forever, but you are done playing collegiate sports. If I'm a cheerleader and I don't compete I don't lose any of my years. So I could still be 30 and competing if I choose to do so later. I think if they are trying to look legitimate to NCAA or whoever the eligibility rule needs to be for years, not championships.
But if you take four years for a bachelors and 2 for a masters, you would only be eligible for that one year of grad school. You can stay in grad school forever, but you are done playing collegiate sports. If I'm a cheerleader and I don't compete I don't lose any of my years. So I could still be 30 and competing if I choose to do so later. I think if they are trying to look legitimate to NCAA or whoever the eligibility rule needs to be for years, not championships.
No, NCAA is not set up the same as they are trying to set up cheer.
NCAA eligibility is done off years you play. Hence red-shirting or grad school athletes who do play.
What do you mean, what the difference between 4 years or 5? We don't have a season like other sports so all they can count for us is nationals.
I mean, obviously we're not set up like an NCAA sport, but the premise is the same. I'm not sure we're arguing different things here, but I'm not sure what you're arguing.
I absolutely think they will. That's what I would do.I personally like it. Do you think that more elite squads will place people (especially guys) on sideline cheer until they are ready?
It takes a while for guys to really develop these elite skills.
Just a thought and curious to responses.
I'm not trying to argue :rolleyes: . The point I was trying to make is in NCAA D1 they have a five year rule that starts when the student starts college full time. Once those five years are up they are up and you don't get any more regardless of if you played sports or not (with some exceptions like military).