Oh Kingston, I understand progressive minds and thinking pretty well. I suggest you always at least consider the conservative POV, as I tend to always try to consider the progressive for balance and best outcome. That said, change is almost always wrapped in good ideas and intention. As stated above, the key is anticipating the unintended consequences and having appropriate contingency plans and flexibility to deal with them. That plus an open mind and effective evaluation of the change and consequences over time leads to effective change. But enough philosophy.
I think this has more to do with control of the dollar than anything else, and if with power comes cautious and benign control, than positive change is very achievable. I do think arguing against the term "sport" with it's inherent categorization on local and state level concerning policy and sanctioning makes more sense in the picture being painted. We'll see, but for me, to this point, it has been a fun and productive ride. I hope money does not pollute the sport too much. But I can see this leading, to say, sanctioned gyms buying only one manufacturer of uniforms, going to certain camps, and competitions. If you can say where you can go, you can say what you have to buy and where you have to stay. AND, if that type of heavy hand prevails, you will see alternatives sprout and thrive in fertile soil.
