- Jan 16, 2014
- 8,264
- 9,143
I don't get the "it's their senior year, so they should get [insert performance-based privilege]." If it really mattered to a senior that it is their last year, then they would be acting like it by consistently giving their best effort.It works. Girls know when they aren't the best. I actually hated when we would do lines based on seniority because knew I was better than some of them. Same for routine formations. For years the previous coach would give seniors the front line because 'it's their senior year' but they were being outperformed by the girls in the back.
It's a hard habit to break for sure. Some girls who aren't the most talented, wait till senior year to finally feel like they're the 'top dog.' It's a way for them to feel validated---yeah I might not have my two to tuck BUT I'm a senior, I'm captain so what I say go. Bless her heart-my friend was the weakest talent wise of our grade and yet she was the most brutal when she became captain.
It's something I would slowly implement. My coach had to wait till some of the more power tripped girls had been weaned out until she could successfully start to awarding to talent v. seniority.
I love the idea of treating alternates as substitutes at games. Lots of teams don't view their performance/appearance at games as being as important as competitions, and that system would force them to take it more seriously because everyone wants to be seen. Remove the guarantee and I imagine kids shape up pretty quick.