- May 18, 2010
- 1,600
- 2,744
the back extension would be considered a standing element and you'd only get credit to doing a ro bhs tuck
It's the same as connecting a punch front forward roll with a step into a ro bhs tuck, correct @Andre ?
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
the back extension would be considered a standing element and you'd only get credit to doing a ro bhs tuck
my cp did this the other day...looked awesome (busted on the tuck but if she hit it, it would've been amazing!)Not really sure about the hardest but one could be: Front walkover, roundoff, bhs stepout, roundoff, bhs, tuck. Two to a tuck if possible. :)
It's the same as connecting a punch front forward roll with a step into a ro bhs tuck, correct @Andre ?
nope. only level 4 and upIs a fronthandspring front tuck legal in level 3?
just about to post this:)Not really sure about the hardest but one could be: Front walkover, roundoff, bhs stepout, roundoff, bhs, tuck. Two to a tuck if possible. :)
Just an FYI. Legality rules are separate for how something is scored.According to the new rules, adding a jump into a tumbling line breaks the line. You'd get credit for doing a ro BHS (level two), toe touch BHS BHS (a level 3 standing element) and a RO tuck (a basic level 3 line). It looks cool but won't get the marks you want.
front handspring step out round off BHS, BHS step out, front punch*, round off BHS tuck.
I thought the front punch part was legal but I could be wrong.
a punch front out of a bhs step out would be really awkward