Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Rockstar is sending three teams to worlds-Beatles, Rolling Stones and 2 Live Crew. They have tons of teams attending Summit. I know last year Rockstar Raleigh had all their summit teams place in top 10 with one winning Sr. 1. I believe that more and more teams will become pretty well known.I had no idea Rockstar had so many locations along with Fame I've only heard of Beatles (maybe Rolling Stones?) and Fame super seniors BTW CEA will be adding another location in Chattanooga,Tennessee for the 17-18 season :)
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Rockstar is sending three teams to worlds-Beatles, Rolling Stones and 2 Live Crew. They have tons of teams attending Summit. I know last year Rockstar Raleigh had all their summit teams place in top 10 with one winning Sr. 1. I believe that more and more teams will become pretty well known.
I would say they would become more we'll know as time goes on they are just now getting to be more well known I guess since sadly only worlds teams get recognition it's harder to get your gym more we'll know if they haven't been around as long as a gym like Stingrays or CEA
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Yep I was thinking the same thing. Stones (their original small coed team) and Killers both placed top 3 at Worlds in 2010, Killers getting 2nd two years in a row. Rockstar has been a well known name since at least then, and they've had several successful non-worlds teams.That's not exactly true! If you're a little older around my age which I shall not disclose you would know that Rockstar has been a pretty well known name for a good while now. They've had teams outside of Beatles place very well at Worlds such as their IOAG 5 Killers
Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk
That's not exactly true! If you're a little older around my age which I shall not disclose you would know that Rockstar has been a pretty well known name for a good while now. They've had teams outside of Beatles place very well at Worlds such as their IOAG 5 Killers
Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk
Thank you so much for the Killers nostalgiaYep I was thinking the same thing. Stones (their original small coed team) and Killers both placed top 3 at Worlds in 2010, Killers getting 2nd two years in a row. Rockstar has been a well known name since at least then, and they've had several successful non-worlds teams.
I know, I've missed them too!Thank you so much for the Killers nostalgia![]()
You've all earned this gem!!I know, I've missed them too!
I believe there are multiple business models being used by the various gyms. Some are more along the "franchise" line where the individual gyms are owned by someone local and a fee or other arrangement is sent to the "main" gym in exchange for using the name/logo. (There may also be varying levels of advice/services being provided by the main program.). On the other end of the spectrum are gyms that are run that owned at least in part by the "main" program. There are also probably hybrids that fall somewhere in the middle.
There are pros and cons to each arrangement. I am curious to hear opinions about the two. Do you think that one style is better for the industry?
I coach at a franchise but we are not that far from the main gym. We often collaborate, do guest coaching at both locations, and sometimes do clinics and showcases together. I've seen some franchises not even get uniforms until halfway into the competition season. I definitely feel fortunate that our main gym is really involved if we need them and we're not just about gaining locations.I believe there are multiple business models being used by the various gyms. Some are more along the "franchise" line where the individual gyms are owned by someone local and a fee or other arrangement is sent to the "main" gym in exchange for using the name/logo. (There may also be varying levels of advice/services being provided by the main program.). On the other end of the spectrum are gyms that are run that owned at least in part by the "main" program. There are also probably hybrids that fall somewhere in the middle.
There are pros and cons to each arrangement. I am curious to hear opinions about the two. Do you think that one style is better for the industry?