Cheer Dad
Cheer Parent
- Dec 15, 2009
- 9,652
- 15,625
I didn't see that at all.
Congrats on the bid
** ^^^ that's my sarcasm font**
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
I didn't see that at all.
I know, I am a little disappointed in the outcome in that my predictions didn't come true (but happy for PAC as they have been the perennial bridesmaid at this comp the past few years). Curious to know though how a gym that received AL bids for two teams with essentially almost all of the same kids on both teams plans to handle that situation, and why that is acceptable (since both cannot be used in the long run) as it basically took an AL bid away from another gymClose but no cigar. [emoji23]
** ^^^ that's my sarcasm font**
thank you!!Congrats on the bid
** ^^^ that's my sarcasm font**
I know, I am a little disappointed in the outcome in that my predictions didn't come true (but happy for PAC as they have been the perennial bridesmaid at this comp the past few years). Curious to know though how a gym that received AL bids for two teams with essentially almost all of the same kids on both teams plans to handle that situation, and why that is acceptable (since both cannot be used in the long run) as it basically took an AL bid away from another gym
I think he/she means crossovers.What's the number of athletes that can be replaced within a gym?
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
I think he/she means crossovers.
Scoring was out of 105. Not sure why but that's what it was. So scores really weren't that high
I'm 99.999999% sure it is the same event producers as previous years & if I'm wrong I will eat cheer bows for breakfast for a month
Correct me if I am wrong, but there are still substitution limitations for any bid received.So basically they needed two AL bids, because if either of those teams got paid then the new rule from last season (below) would have locked them into team #2. That's an issue when majority of your two teams are the same kids. LOL jokes on us ;)
"Athletes within the same program are limited to the number of teams on which they are eligible to compete and earn paid or partial-paid bids. Once an athlete has competed for a team and earned a paid or partial-paid bid, the athlete is permitted to move to another team within his or her program. If the athlete's second team earns a paid or partial-paid bid, they are bound to the second team and may only compete with the second team at Worlds. The athlete is no longer eligible to compete with the first team once the second team is awarded a paid or partial-paid bid."
Personally that's a pretty high score for the pretty basic stunts they did and some, didn't do.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
So basically they needed two AL bids, because if either of those teams got paid then the new rule from last season (below) would have locked them into team #2. That's an issue when majority of your two teams are the same kids. LOL jokes on us ;)
"Athletes within the same program are limited to the number of teams on which they are eligible to compete and earn paid or partial-paid bids. Once an athlete has competed for a team and earned a paid or partial-paid bid, the athlete is permitted to move to another team within his or her program. If the athlete's second team earns a paid or partial-paid bid, they are bound to the second team and may only compete with the second team at Worlds. The athlete is no longer eligible to compete with the first team once the second team is awarded a paid or partial-paid bid."
Or they could take the maximum alternates from other teams in the gym.So they will probably not have 2 teams which means the 2nd bid is tossed away instead of given to another team.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk