I should rephrase. I think that the uni companies shouldn't sell you unis that are not compliant.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Again, if one wont. Another will.
For example... the uniform companies can provide warnings & disclaimers to gyms that their uniform may be 'too risque' but they will assume no liability should gyms be deducted. Then, if a gym does need new uniforms because they're being deducted - uniform company just got 2 orders out of one gym. Why would the refuse business the first time around, because they deem the uniform to not be compliant...?
I also agree with
@cheermomforever ... you cannot compare creating clothing to over serving a patron which could have
life-altering consequences... but for argument sake, lets look at your bartending example - drawing on my own personal experiences in this industry:
If one bartender cuts a guy off - he might just go and find another bartender or establishment willing to serve him (whether that's right or wrong...). In my experience, it is extremely difficult to communicate to a nightclub or bartending staff of 50+ people that "the guy wearing the baseball cap, white t-shirt and jeans is cut off for the night". AND - it is even harder to judge how much someone has had to drink, especially if he/she is not showing obvious signs of intoxication & you personally didn't serve his first 5/6/7 drinks.
Furthermore - if the patron is not being unruly, it would cause a bigger problem to forcefully remove him from the establishment.
At the end of the day, what makes sense on paper or in a 'textbook' is often far from what actually works or makes sense in practice.