- Mar 24, 2012
- 1,477
- 3,477
i see CEA, WC and CA in this circle. but i dont recognize anyone from orange or f5
I would have LOVED to have heard everything that was said in this circle.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
i see CEA, WC and CA in this circle. but i dont recognize anyone from orange or f5
Pro cheer Eagles had 0 deductions, the scoresheet was just posted. Fearless had deductions but a good performance that after they performed we all said we thought was a hit. Not sure what the deduction was for there but overall it was a good performance that they probably wouldn't want to redo. And I'm not saying you assumed F5 didn't want a redo, but that was the general assumption on here when we learned of the vote thing, everyone was like "well why would F5 want to redo??" Completely ignoring the other 5 teams in the division and acting like only the big 5 were included in the discussion.I'm not assuming F5 didn't want a redo, for all I know, they did. And for what it's worth, the only team who actually hit in LAG was the team from Canada. Fearless and Eagles both had heavy deductions too.
Right? I almost hoped they show clips of last night..THIS IS NOT THE TIME FOR A MONTAGE
and they obviously had to put a video just to make sure were wasting enough time
2 of the top 5 teams voted noJust saying if they had to be called down I'm guessing they weren't angry and were likely the ones who voted not to redo.... Which makes sense since those teams hit. So let's stop assuming F5 is the only team that didn't want to redo!! :)
I said those same words in front of a classroom full of 15 year olds...whoopsiesThe words that just came out my mouth looking at those scores and deductions are entirely too inappropriate.
Pro cheer Eagles had 0 deductions, the scoresheet was just posted. Fearless had deductions but a good performance that after they performed we all said we thought was a hit. Not sure what the deduction was for there but overall it was a good performance that they probably wouldn't want to redo. And I'm not saying you assumed F5 didn't want a redo, but that was the general assumption on here when we learned of the vote thing, everyone was like "well why would F5 want to redo??" Completely ignoring the other 5 teams in the division and acting like only the big 5 were included in the discussion.
Hold up- was the Spirit All-stars in IOSC6 the one from CT? They're in SECOND!?!? WHAT WHAT?!
ETA: I'm also manually catching up on yesterday. I'm at page 80. We only had 73 day 1. Still have 146? left to go.
2 of the top 5 teams voted no