- Dec 14, 2009
- 7,234
- 19,629
F5 had two under-rotated doubles. Maybe it never counted against you as much before, but this year, it mattered. And they happened, and it cost them points. This is fact. Even without it, I don't think it would have gotten them higher than 2nd/3rd, yes? WC did not have nearly the execution/flexibility as the other teams and were a little disjointed, although my GOODNESS did they have energy. Panthers had a little wobble which cost them in building score although also incredible energy/skill/cleanliness, which is why they were in second. Heck, some people (myself included) weren't even sure Stars would medal. Sorry, nobody hit as well as SE did, scores don't lie, get. over. it. Worlds almost happened a week ago. (Not you, the metaphorical you lol)from between reading fierceboard and twitter during worlds weekend, everyone seemed to have a general agreement, that WC, F5 or Panthers should have won worlds... basically anyone but senior elite.... ?? i dont get it, they all had falls day one except Panthers, so in reality if anyone deserved it more it would have been Panthers. teenagers:rolleyes:....
(not trying to throw SE under the bus, but i dont get why everyone seemed to have that opinion)
Also I watched OO5 again and was surprised when I cried again..how, I don't know. Loved that WCSS interview, wish people weren't screaming and I could actually hear it. WHOA tiger you interview very well, not easy to do on the spot!