- Mar 18, 2012
- 5,405
- 10,656
It's probably better because it would most likely be the difference between a 4.9 and a 5 instead of a .5 deduction. Unless you weren't maxed but it still seems like a fall would hurt you moreWouldn't you just get a lowered score for not having the maxed number of stunt groups - or whatever it's called - when they count that you have X number of athletes and aren't putting up that number divided by 4 (dropping any remainders). Of course, I don't know if that's worse than having a fall, but I'd guess it wouldn't be.