- Jun 13, 2015
- 88
- 95
Agreed. They had kids on 3 teams at summit last year.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
That is also not illegal. The Summit allows crossovers with several restrictions, and also allows replacement and addition of athletes (within the same division). You could win a bid with 9 athletes in senior 2 and it would be completely legal to get rid of those original nine and replace them with 20 altogether different senior level 5 athletes (assuming 5 or fewer of those athletes competed at worlds, and also assuming that those 20 athletes are not competing on other teams AT THE SUMMIT other than levels 1, 2, 3, or 4.2, and no more than two teams at the Summit per athlete). Although people may find this practice distasteful, it is not against any current rules.I know it isn't but at Summit it will be so they are doing this to get a bid than compete with different kids.
Seriously!This thread. Wow.
They had j2, SR 2 and sr4 at the summit last year, but were with LAST years rules. They had kids cross to 3 teams and most of the sr4 was on the j2 (that won the summit) but last year that was ok. This year is a different story.That is also not illegal. The Summit allows crossovers with several restrictions, and also allows replacement and addition of athletes (within the same division). You could win a bid with 9 athletes in senior 2 and it would be completely legal to get rid of those original nine and replace them with 20 altogether different senior level 5 athletes (assuming 5 or fewer of those athletes competed at worlds, and also assuming that those 20 athletes are not competing on other teams AT THE SUMMIT other than levels 1, 2, 3, or 4.2, and no more than two teams at the Summit per athlete). Although people may find this practice distasteful, it is not against any current rules.
Thank you for posting hard evidence. That is shocking and disturbing that this type of thing happened.... why are 12 and 13 y/o little girls hanging out with 18 and 21 y/o old MEN? In a hotel room?
I'm. Speechless.
Wait, no I'm not, who in the H-E-L-L lets their 12 and 13 yo daughters hang out with 17 and 18 yo boys? I'm going to pretend it was the brother of one of the girls because otherwise I just can't with these people.
I don't like seeing parents who allow their minor children to find themselves in situations such as this. I understand even the best parents can have children who make poor choices but this scenario looks bad. One of the perks of having a teenage Allstar cheerleader is the demanding schedule limits the exposure of drugs & underage drinking. I never thought about all the hotel stays for competitions resulting in exposure.Thank you for posting hard evidence. That is shocking and disturbing that this type of thing happened.... why are 12 and 13 y/o little girls hanging out with 18 and 21 y/o old MEN? In a hotel room?
You'd be surprised. Especially at Worlds.I don't like seeing parents who allow their minor children to find themselves in situations such as this. I understand even the best parents can have children who make poor choices but this scenario looks bad. One of the perks of having a teenage Allstar cheerleader is the demanding schedule limits the exposure of drugs & underage drinking. I never thought about all the hotel stays for competitions resulting in exposure.
Sent from my SM-G920V using Tapatalk
Awww...why you got to go there? Maybe they were just having pizza :DSeriously. Where the fk are the parents? At the bar???
Awww...why you got to go there? Maybe they were just having pizza :D
Let me say this...without knowing who this gym is (though I know their name), this may be the first time I've ever heard of someone "accidently" cheating. I've been doing this a long time. We all know the age restrictions. We've all made sure we have the current cheer age on every athlete SOMEWHERE so we can reference it. We've all been in situations when you go to use someone, and then realize they aren't age eligible. Never, not once, have I ever even thought about competing someone who wasn't eligible. There's no excuse for what they did. They can say it was an accident and was used to fill in for a sick athlete, but that doesn't hold water with me. If there is no one age eligible, you either mark the stunt, or you exhibition. Last year, we had a car pool get into a pretty serious accident on the way to a competition. No major injuries, but they couldn't make the comp. It affected several teams. We told the EP we would make them all go exhibition and the coaches filled in so the teams could go full out. It happens, but putting a non age eligible athlete on the floor never would have been a consideration. They can be upset all they want that area teams "ganged up" on them. You cheated. Whether you did it purposely or not, you cheated. Now you pay the price.