- Dec 4, 2009
- 14,108
- 19,303
- Thread starter
- #31
I do think that it would be a bit less intimidating if the production value were lower, but I feel that you are selling NCA short to suggest that the lights are a major component of it's mystique.
Again, I point you to Worlds with it's woefully inadequate venue and relatively minimal production values. It manages to qualify as a major event without all the bells and whistles.
In fairness to USASF, there isn't much that can be done to spruce up the VFKA Milk House or Josten's short of tearing them down and building something new. (or moving it somewhere else) Also, the awards/trophies are the best of any event.
Remember, not what makes the event special to win, but what INTIMIDATES people about it.
Might be a difference in opinion but I don't think I am selling them short. Quantifying what makes something better can take the mystery (and therefor awe) out of it. And the one specific piece I am focussing on is the intimidation factor. Kids (and gyms) who have never been to Dallas walk in and have an absolute deer in the headlights look on their face when walking around around. The production is so massive, and dark, and those lights and stage are absolutely terrifying! Just looking at that picture I know that feeling I get when I am at Dallas. I don't get it at Worlds (even those Worlds is technically bigger to win). So where is that emotional response coming from? The mood. The ambiance.
Couple that the low crossovers, strict following of the rules, difficult scoresheets.
But, like I said, i still consider this the top dawg competition to win. It has always been the conglomeration of everything they do. I am just choosing the largest emotional piece.
Athletic did their homework and has started doing an ambiance similar to NCA. It has helped totally turn around their event in Chattanooga for us from one of our least favorites to being a joy to go to. The teams there havent really changed. The scoresheet last year was the Varsity, but it didn't feel as different as it did this year. But this year it was WAY better.
I would love to do an experiment, so if NCA and another company could help me out. If NCA could completely compete with all the lights on I am curious if the intimidation factor would stay. And then if they could do it for 3 years in a row would people hold NCA in less esteem?
THEN if another EP would try the same lighting techniques that NCA uses (I actually think this one could happen). If another EP spent time to black out almost ALL ambient light at a competition and then well light the competitors would the intimidation factor jump?