- Mar 23, 2010
- 6,670
- 20,430
- Moderator
- #391
a stunt fall is a .1 deduction. So stars had potentially .3 deducted for falls plus a touch in tumbling which is .05. Their deductions should be .35 based on what we saw wrong with the routine.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: this_feature_currently_requires_accessing_site_using_safari
Ya someone else pointed that out. I read the scores wrong.
Yea that was me, you quoted me twice
BTW, just wanna say thanks to everyone posting in this thread. It's been really pleasant and civil today. All the troublemakers must be in Indy...
a stunt fall is a .1 deduction. So stars had potentially .3 deducted for falls plus a touch in tumbling which is .05. Their deductions should be .35 based on what we saw wrong with the routine.
I'm very surprised if F5 didn't get any deductions
im REALLY disappointed in stars but i hope f5 wins so noone can argue over the whole "sr elite or shooting stars for world champions 2011" thanks everyone for updating it helped me ALOT
Very TrueOh they'll still argue, but they'll finally be adding F5 back into that conversation.