- Oct 27, 2010
- 167
- 295
I still have the originals. They re-worded several things.
i would love to see a side by side, if that isn't an inconvenience
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
I still have the originals. They re-worded several things.
In re-reading it, it is the only change they made. I thought they revised the first guideline to remove sweatpants, pajama pants etc. but it was further down.i would love to see a side by side, if that isn't an inconvenience
The USASF has REMOVED the discriminatory parts from their Image Etiquette Page....
http://usasf.net.ismmedia.com/ISM2//News/USASF%20Image%20Etiquette%20Final.pdf
Interesting....
Interesting...agreed but why remove it unless you know that serious repercussions can now be established. Hope someone screenshot it. I wonder who was directly responsible for this discrimination?
I wanna see the original again...I should've done a screen shotI have screenshots on my phone and hard copies of the original in PDF...
If they apologize and admit they were wrong then don't do anything but since they haven't I'm still offended by it!What does everyone think about a lawyer doing anything with this now that its taken down??? Ive been working with someone over PM who had someone wanting to work on this, but whats everyones thoughts?
I say - stick with it until an official apology is handed out. They said it, they published it, they clearly meant it... they only removed it because of the huge uproar.