- Nov 19, 2012
- 368
- 382
After all the hype, those kids were just not ready for that performance...at all. Interested to see if they will "buy different kids" to do the performance tonight. Just kidding, but im sure if they could they would.:rolleyes:
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
They aren't recognizable like Angel.
Also, I'll say it. Those stunts needed Gabi. She would have been the star and taken away from the average stunts and made it wow.
Also, I'll say it. Those stunts needed Gabi. She would have been the star and taken away from the average stunts and made it wow.
uhm . . .Gabi's flexible, I'll give her that, but nothing I've seen from her has ever given me an indication that she's anything more than just an average flyer. No offence to her at all, she's a beautiful flyer, but I don't see her being exceptional over most flyers in level 5 outside of flexibility.
uhm . . .
Impressive, yes. But easily possible for other flyers, and 99% of the work done in that stunt is by the bases. She went straight up at Worlds last year and I'm supposed to believe she's some remarkable flyer?
ETA: I should say in the 2nd 1 1/2 up most work is done by the bases, not through the whole stunt, but 1 1/2 to squish is still not remarkably impressive.
You can have the strongest bases but with a weak flyer the stunt will never hit. She has amazing body control and beautiful technique with every skill she does.Impressive, yes. But easily possible for other flyers, and 99% of the work done in that stunt is by the bases. She went straight up at Worlds last year and I'm supposed to believe she's some remarkable flyer?
ETA: I should say in the 2nd 1 1/2 up most work is done by the bases, not through the whole stunt, but 1 1/2 to squish is still not remarkably impressive.
The issue here would actually be more along the lines of "fair use" than anything else. I can use a trademark as long as the use of that trademark doesn't imply some endorsement of the product. That's why you see trademarked logos in parodies sometimes. In this case, does naming your team Dolce & Gabbana imply some kind of endorsement? Perhaps, perhaps not. Again, if I'm an Italian fashion house, shooting off letters to All-star cheer teams to cease and desist using a logo is probably very low on my list of priorities.
Sent from my DROID RAZR using Tapatalk 2
I wouldn't bet on it, because I know that lots of big name fashion houses call out cake-makers (lots of whom stay-at-home-moms earning a little money for the family) for using their logos - even if it was just one single cake they sold with the logo on it.
So I guess it's only a matter of time for them to get to Trinity.
I wouldn't bet on it, because I know that lots of big name fashion houses call out cake-makers (lots of whom stay-at-home-moms earning a little money for the family) for using their logos - even if it was just one single cake they sold with the logo on it.
So I guess it's only a matter of time for them to get to Trinity.
Gabi's flexible, I'll give her that, but nothing I've seen from her has ever given me an indication that she's anything more than just an average flyer. No offence to her at all, she's a beautiful flyer, but I don't see her being exceptional over most flyers in level 5 outside of flexibility.