- Dec 14, 2009
- 7,635
- 18,436
This is a thread to debate the following:
Resolved: USASF has made all star cheerleading better.
I'm sure I will be involved in this thread a great deal. Many people have seen me as a shill for USASF, or on their secret payroll or just as an idiot. Whatever.
There are a number of issues that USASF hasn't dealt with very well. But with all the positives and negatives combined, USASF has put cheerleading in a better position. NACCC probably intensified the attention on the need for a single rule book. But USASF actually made it happen. Cheersport pioneered the Level play system. But USASF actually brought it to event producers across the board.
The USASF coaches credentialing program has received criticism (some of it perfectly valid), but parents now have a way of judging if coaches have at least some knowledge required to teach their child.
There are other reasons, but I'll start with this.
For what it's worth, i might argue the opposite side in a later post.
Resolved: USASF has made all star cheerleading better.
I'm sure I will be involved in this thread a great deal. Many people have seen me as a shill for USASF, or on their secret payroll or just as an idiot. Whatever.
There are a number of issues that USASF hasn't dealt with very well. But with all the positives and negatives combined, USASF has put cheerleading in a better position. NACCC probably intensified the attention on the need for a single rule book. But USASF actually made it happen. Cheersport pioneered the Level play system. But USASF actually brought it to event producers across the board.
The USASF coaches credentialing program has received criticism (some of it perfectly valid), but parents now have a way of judging if coaches have at least some knowledge required to teach their child.
There are other reasons, but I'll start with this.
For what it's worth, i might argue the opposite side in a later post.