Both the teams I coach won, and I felt like the comments on the s/s where very constructive opposed to "add more tumbling" etc.. However the scoring itself confused me .. For the level 2 team I coach, on 1 s/s a judge scored us a little over 2 points lower then the other judge that was judging us. Sense it wasent category judging I'm wondering where the consistency was myself. How can one judge see us as near perfect and the other not so much?? Not complaing are score was extremely high and we won but the other coach and I were just confused. Maybe that judge was a "lower" scoring judge but none the less there should be some consistency in how there scoring and what there looking for in order to score a certain way.
