- Mar 25, 2010
- 573
- 791
whoa...... whoa whoa whoa.... that's random!
But HOORAY SPIRIT!!!
But HOORAY SPIRIT!!!
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Actually the competition runs Friday or Saturday through Monday. One day is High School Nationals, Saturday was Small gym, and then Sun/Mon All Star.Does anyone know why the competition is held on Sunday and Monday?
What a expensive mistake - from what I'm reading - it's not the first time ACA has had this problem.
#biddramamess
Announced Paid to Spirit IOC - and, then mistakenly passed it down to Cheer Athletics Wildcats.....
... when it should have went to Spirit Medium Coed.
They made it right and gave Spirit an additional bid, so props to them.. but dang - who is getting their butt ripped for that $25k mistake!
Paid Bids:
Panthers
Spirit Med Coed
Wildcats
What an expensive mistake - from what I'm reading - it's not the first time ACA has had this problem.
Any videos? What happened to CA cheetahs?
Are you suggesting they are advertising these "mistakes"? That would be a scandal in itself.It's more than $25k. It's the other EP's who get extremely mad because this competition gets to give out an extra bid. It is becoming a very interesting tradition. Why wouldn't another competition just 'make' that mistake next year to increase attendance?
Are you suggesting they are advertising these "mistakes"? That would be a scandal in itself.
I agree ACEDAD - they should be penalized - by having LESS bids to offer the next year.Not ACA, but Varsity. I remember specifically UCA had to grant an extra bid and I believe NCA had to as well.
My point is that it's an awful convenient way around bid limitations. If you were sitting around a table and had a way to award bids the CA Panthers, CA Wildcats and SOT if you ONLY had 3 bids, this sure does look like a way to make it happen.
The "penalty" shouldn't just be the $25,000 for the bid; the penalty should be that the EP has to give one LESS bid the next year to correct the error.
The first time it happened, I didn't like it, but UCA got USASF approval to make it happen. Things happen and I get that.
But when it got approved, it seems awfully suspicious to me that two additional Varsity EP's have had the SAME issue.
Yes, but as ACEDAD said - UCA has done it NCA has done it.... now ACA...No need to advertise. Who won't know about this in Texas?
Yes, but as ACEDAD said - UCA has done it NCA has done it.... now ACA...
Is this Varsity's way of trying to have more hands in the mix for Worlds then JamBrands? - even more then was agreed upon by the Varsity dominated USASF.