- Mar 11, 2011
- 331
- 358
Ok so would you all prefer the author called it fiction and changed the names of the gyms and the people involved? Smh
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
i know. i know many of the people who she talks about and i see some of them multiple times a week and it makes me so uncomfortable to read.I just started reading this tonight and I'm currently on chapter 5. I live in IL, took privates at ICC and generally know of all the people she's talking about. I also have a friend that was on the team with her at the time that part 1 was written about. I have to say I feel very uncomfortable reading a lot of this. I've read other cheer books before and lots of shady things happen. But it's another thing to know exactly who is being talked about. Many of the names are not changed. It's honestly hard for me to continue reading and I can't help but feel like writing this book in this manner was a huge mistake on her part.
Naturally all the crazies come out of the woodwork now that this is being discussed. Which one of you wrote it? Because it's safe to assume it was one of the people that keep defending it on this thread. Not to mention, I'm sure the author used a fake name., so I'd love if someone outted the author.
Synopsis:
I, I, I, I, I.
Sweeps entire cheer world into a stereotype.
I, I, I, but, I and I.
Begins intensive pot smoking training regimen.
I, I, I, I, I.
Uses poor grammar.
I, I, I, I, I.
Snuggles a puppy
I, I, I, I, I.
Possibly an alluded sex scene, but I was skipping to about every third sentence.
I, I, I, I, I.
Reveals purpose of book which is apparently to be "in a relationship" on Facebook.
I, therefore, I. (Just kidding! That's a long word!)
Ok so would you all prefer the author called it fiction and changed the names of the gyms and the people involved? Smh
I'll be honest, I got the book because I wanted to see if it would help fill in some of the gaps in the gossip I've heard over the past few years. What I got was a poorly written story of someone painting herself as a victim while throwing everyone she's worked with under the bus. I won't say that there weren't a lot of things that I knew to be the truth in the book, but honestly, if you're at that many gyms in that amount of time, you need to take a good look in the mirror and ask yourself if you may be part of the problem. There's a lot of monkey business up here, but it takes less effort to stay out of it than it does to get involved. Plenty of gyms in the Chicago suburbs manage to keep their noses out of it and their hands clean.
.
I cant help but laugh that you reviewed your own book :p:D
Accidental publication isn't a defense. And, in the case of the defamation being about a normal, not public-type figure, it would actually hurt the person who wrote it, because private citizens only have to prove negligence as the level of fault (not checking that it was true--which would fall on the publisher in this case I would presume).
There are other defenses though--opinion and rhetorical hyperbole.
But since no one (I'm assuming, I didn't read it so I have no idea who she mentioned) in the book is a public figure, they only have to prove negligence instead of actual malice of defamation.
Mamarazzi the other gyms that actually get sections of the book are CIA, LZE, and 5 Star. There are others that get mentions, but those are the 5 that she devotees whole sections to.