- Apr 3, 2014
- 305
- 364
I have no desire to banter whether your criticism on social media of the SMO's is equal to that of the criticism the SMO's dealt on social media to Jenee. You have your opinion and I mine.I would know not to use that language on social media, however I know that different stroke for different folks and others have been brought up different ways than I have and are different people than me so I can accept that maybe they didn't see the swear words as bad language.
(That makes me sound like I'm a saint or something - I'm not, I have always just been brought up in a way that swearing is rude and don't use it)
And, for me personally, I don't think I'm doing what some of the Smo's did. We are both definitely criticising, I wouldn't deny that, but we are not saying it in the same way. I could say "those f****** smoed kids are so b***** rude, I can't believe they would be so s*** to their friend ugh" like they did but I didn't. And I'm being critical on an open discussion forum without an intention to hurt someone, not on a twitter account with 2k followers.
I know you have a bias to Cali and are going to defend/disagree with no matter what I say, so this may have been a pointless post - So can we agree to disagree that I didn't like it because I don't like swearing and you don't have a problem with it?
I mentioned in a prior post, I'm sure I haven't seen all of the tweets produced. I don' even use twitter. I certainly haven't seen tweets laced with the kind of profanity that you say exist. Of course I don't condone vulgarity, tweeted or otherwise. And, as I mentioned previously if my CP posted a tweet talking like that she wouldn't have a twitter account any longer. There is no excuse for bad manners. And, if you're in a position of influence or a role model to others, you have an added responsibility to represent yourself and your affiliation (in this case gym) in the best manner possible. That obviously was not heeded in this situation.
Previous discussion had been regarding SMO's tweets about Jenee. Now it's morphed into discussion about the use of profanity on social media. Those are two very distinctly different topics. For you to presume that I condone profanity on social media because I defended the SMO's feelings of betrayal is a real stretch.
You are welcome to feel I have a CALI bias. Just because I don't agree with your view, then I must be bias ? That seems an arrogant way to think. To follow that logic I'm to presume that your bias against CALI ? This is a ridiculous discussion. We have two different viewpoints....that's all.
I have no dog in this fight regardless of what you believe. No matter the team, under the same circumstances I would feel the very same way. In the future as details come out you may rethink your position about the SMO's justification for feeling hurt . Until then, we'll agree to disagree with no animus.
Now, my only hope is to never revisit this topic again. Everyone else has left it in the dust, yet we're still chewing on it ad nauseum. This is it, no more for me. I'm done rehashing old news.
The Fierce Board App! || iPhone || Android