All-Star Disqualifying Cheaters

[Cheermom1969]

Sweat tea? Geez, you are weirder than I thought.

Good stuff! (for those over 21, please drink responsibly.) ;)

 

[Beans100]

Good stuff! (for those over 21, please drink responsibly.) ;)

So, those under 21 don't have to drink responsibly? :D

 

[Cheermom1969]

So, those under 21 don't have to drink responsibly? :D

Well, I could say, duh, do they ever? lol
It was more along the lines of the stupid "warnings" on the beer commercials you see.

 

[King]

So, those under 21 don't have to drink responsibly? :D

In theory if you are under 21 and drinking it can never be responsibly because it is inherently illegal.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

 

[stuntjumptumble]

THANK YOU NCA!!!!! This is definitely a big issue that has been swept under the rug, props to them


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

 

[Beans100]

Well, I could, duh, do they ever? lol
It was more along the lines of the stupid "warnings" on the beer commercials you see.

In theory if you are under 21 and drinking it can never be responsibly because it is inherently illegal.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Y'all are both right. I get too snarky for my own good sometimes.

 

[Official OWECheer]

Y'all are both right. I get too snarky for my own good sometimes.

Party of two tho XD

 

[Eyes On The Prize]

I wonder what, if any, disciplinary actions USASF will take against the teams found cheating.

I'd like to see something along the lines of the gym cannot attend worlds, summit, and/or NCA nationals for that year and the next. That could potentially threaten a gym's entire livelihood. I feel like that's a drastic enough punishment to really deter gyms from cheating.

Also, does sandbagging fall under this "cheating" thing? It's sounds like the gyms that were reprimanded were done so because they had age illegible athletes on their teams.

 

[dawgshow]

Also, does sandbagging fall under this "cheating" thing? It's sounds like the gyms that were reprimanded were done so because they had age illegible athletes on their teams.

Sandbagging is unethical, but not illegal

 

[MzLyn23]

Sandbagging is unethical, but not illegal

But it could be... [emoji848][emoji848][emoji848]


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

 

[MzLyn23]

I'm back from a feeding children delay lol see I missed a little but not too much.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

 

[Official OWECheer]

I wonder what, if any, disciplinary actions USASF will take against the teams found cheating.

I'd like to see something along the lines of the gym cannot attend worlds, summit, and/or NCA nationals for that year and the next. That could potentially threaten a gym's entire livelihood. I feel like that's a drastic enough punishment to really deter gyms from cheating.

Also, does sandbagging fall under this "cheating" thing? It's sounds like the gyms that were reprimanded were done so because they had age illegible athletes on their teams.

This would be awesome.

 

[BlueCat]

"Also, does sandbagging fall under this "cheating" thing? It's sounds like the gyms that were reprimanded were done so because they had age illegible athletes on their teams."


I think we view "sandbagging" as competing in a division you are age-eligible for, but at a level significantly below what you "should" be.

 

[VTX]

Their junior team is still listed, but senior co-ed 3 is not.

That's a no on results for their senior 4 coed and their L5 small coed as well.

I was at this comp and I don't remember all of thier teams but I do know the L5 did not perform. (It was the only registered L5 and my older kids were sad when they weren't there)

Sent from my SAMSUNG-SM-G925A using Tapatalk

 

[ilovetocheer10]

Its about time that this issue has been addressed. Its hard to lose to a team by .1 because they drop a level or two.