- Jul 23, 2010
- 541
- 478
Canada has a sex offender registry, but it's not available to the public... I don't understand that at all
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Because of vigilantes who don't respect the law, and also the idea that our modern democratic societies rely on our legal system and prisons to provide a rehabilitative public service to correct deviant behaviour. You do your time for your crime and, for most criminal records, no one needs to know what your criminal past is except those directly influenced -such as your employers- which means gym owners. Your neighbours and society supposedly don't need to know what you have done if you have sufficiently served the sentence imposed by the courts because, by virtue of serving your sentence, you're "fixed". By telling everyone where the sexual offenders are living and who they are, you are by extension undermining the authority of the justice system by saying that they haven't actually managed to "fix" the deviants and it compromises the integrity of the system as a whole. Or at least that's the theory in a very, extremely basic sense. And I'm in no way implying that it's perfect because it is flawed, but overall I'm reasonably satisfied with this sort of justice system over any other on offer. Yes, it's important to keep your kids safe and yourself safe, and to have as much information as possible to do so, but I'm hesitant to open up doors that can have unintended consequences that could infringe upon my future civil liberties, which is the assumption I'm making on why some countries choose not to make criminal records public, or tattoo the forehead of offenders.Canada has a sex offender registry, but it's not available to the public... I don't understand that at all
Just-a-Mom said:OK...I'll answer this because I really don't care, as I'm not affiliated with any of these people. What else happened? the same thing. Again. With a different adult and another minor. Ew.
We just got an updated Do Not Hire list from USAG about two weeks ago.
The one guy from Louisiana that we knew of was on there. He's a convicted sex offender so he's definitely had to register as one in the state. I imagine if they're convicted they can be on that list with no legal ramifications. Working in the gymnastics or cheer industry requires you to work with or around minors so we should have a list also. I'm NOT in favor of a list of people that haven't been convicted of anything but a list of those that have would be a good start.
So does this mean that the pictures on Facebook of coaches and athletes partying - that anyone who sees them will end up on a list?
have you ever seen the show "what would you do?". sometimes you gotta step in when it's not your business for the sake of someone's life, humanity, or plain morals. we cannot play victim to the bystander effect.If it isn't my business, I wouldn't even bring it up....
Just saying.
Actually no I haven't seen that show. But I'll def take up on that offer and watch it ! & my post wasn't directed towards you, I'm just saying IMO If it's not my business, (like "problem", never in my life would I want to own a business) meaning Im going to stay out of it. But everyones obligated to their opinions.have you ever seen the show "what would you do?". sometimes you gotta step in when it's not your business for the sake of someone's life, humanity, or plain morals. we cannot play victim to the bystander effect.
:eek: I agree with everyone else that the parents have to step up and not allow their children to be put in this situation. You would think that coming from a gym that had this happen just a few years prior that the parents would have wised up and stopped letting their children be alone with coaches or the owner.