- Apr 14, 2017
- 1,446
- 1,075
- Thread starter
- #136
This isn’t about talent. It’s about resources and access to them. And you can be the most talented hockey player, but without access to a rink and coaching and equipment, you aren’t making it to a pro league. Cheer is the same.
It is a fact that there is a lack of readily available and financially accessible options in the vast majority of countries outside of Canada and the US. There is a lack of trained coaches because these countries are ‘cheer deserts’ so to speak.
We also arent taking about a cost difference of $1500 vs $5000+ at the high school level for travel either.
I should’ve been clearer: when I said “talent,” I meant the resources and training available to develop talent in the first place. In which case my point still stands: some states have bigger cheer industries that produce more talented athletes. That gives them an edge over other states, and everyone accepts that.
Not to mention travel costs are travel costs, and they can be steep either way.
I don’t know what the solution here is; all I know is that it feels hollow to me to favor some teams over others due to geography. It doesn’t do anyone any favors either way. If you’re on an otherwise strong US team that’s better than most but not strong enough to break top three, I imagine it doesn’t feel good to watch some lesser team advance to finals ahead of you because they’re from Portugal or wherever.
And if you’re on a non-US team and win something ahead of a stronger team because you’re from X country and they’re not, that wouldn’t feel like a victory to me. It’d just feel like pity.