- Dec 14, 2009
- 997
- 1,775
Obsession just made me smile for the 1st time since C5. Loved that routine.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Who really thinks LC is going to run on time?!
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Who really thinks LC is going to run on time?!
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Who really thinks LC is going to run on time?!
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
At this point I wouldn't be surprised if we have Lg Senior teams competing after 11.Who really thinks LC is going to run on time?!
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
There are definitely flaws. I'd be more inclined to agree if there weren't more than 10 non-US countries with worlds medals.Look I agree that the system right now doesn't work, when you have a team score 50 and make it to the finals. I want it to be at least mostly based on merit, hence the minimum score requirement. But I don't want a final made up of 90% US teams and a couple of token teams from Canada and Aus. I don't see that as an 'international' competition.
But I don't think you and I are going to agree on this.
To be fair I don't like it in gymnastics either. Again the best gymnasts should be recognized for being the best... And I don't see how getting 4th, 5th, etc even feels like something you can be proud of when you know there should have been several teams in front of you but those teams didn't get to compete because of a silly rule.To me, it's the same as the gymnastics finals, where the number from each country is limited. Because it's boring and not really 'international' if the finals were to be all US, Russia, Romania and China as we all know they would be.
I would be terribly bored watching a final made up of all Americans. Keep the 3 from each country rule, but work in a minimum score.