wide-worlds-joy is saying that they
should sit out, because you should never depend on someone who is injured to be in their normal top physical form - it's very dangerous to have someone who is injured responsible for doing something you normally have to be in good physical condition for. I, for one, would not want to think that the person between me and the floor had a sprained anything (or worse had left the floor and they kept the routine going without telling me she was gone). I would want the person catching me to be healthy and
able to do so.
That's exactly it, and I'm sorry I wasn't clear (I blame third shift work and pain medications for that). Injuries are serious, as the nurses and EMTs have stated. There's unknown effects and additional problems to even something as simple as a sprained ankle.
I just recently had surgery for a staph infection. There were all kinds of complications. I would hope someone would not be depending on me to catch a girl, even one who is only 100 lbs in a case like that because I physically couldn't do it. A head injury, whether the base or the flier, or even the backspot, could have all kinds of unknown effects, such as brain swelling and so on. Because there's so many unknown complications, I would think that simply from a participant safety point of view, sitting out would be mandated by AT LEAST the coaches.
I mean, when I was in karate, someone who was kicked in the head and who lost consciousness, even for a second, was benched for at least two months. These girls had their scalps ripped open, and the point flier was doing flips and spins still. I mean, kudos to her for going on, but that could have potentially caused a stroke or hemorrhage and killed her. In which case we would be having a very different discussion.
Coaches, gyms and those who sponsor and train these teams really should be the ones pushing and motivating the competition groups to put standards in place for safety. The competition organizers could care less, it's not their kids getting hurt, and as some have said, Worlds isn't useful for anything other than a "that's nice" on a resume. And a medal or trophy won't bring a blown knee back to functioning.
I am NOT saying stop competitive cheer. I'm saying apply the same standards to the safety of the athletes as is used in EVERY other sport out there. Remember the protest storm that happened when Greg Louganis hit his head on the 50 meter platform? He was nearly banned from the rest of the Olympics, and others were depending on him to dive and dive well. Kerry Scruggs and many others have teammates depending on them to perform and perform well, but when injured they were benched and the team went on. If a coach or gym had insisted on an injured participant continuing to do, with the possibility of permanent harm as a result, I honestly think that it would have been such a storm of protest the Federal Government would have been involved eventually.
Sorry, rant over for now. I just think that it's stupefying that we are discussing the kids continuing to perform with injuries that could either be life threatening under ANY other circumstances or ones that could cause permanent damage at 15-20 and effect them for the next 50 years or more. To me, it's a no-brainer. The cheerleader stops performing, period. They don't perform again until they can be demonstrated to have fully recovered, period. The team deals with it and goes on, period. Alternate routines to compensate for the missing person are used, substitutes or understudies go in, period.
And I say all this as a fan who never had a chance to cheer, but really wanted to and would have done a heck of a lot to actually have the opportunity. The sport, IMO, must focus on the safety of the performers FIRST, then the trophy. After all, if the person doing the standing back is hurt to a point where they can't do the competitive cheer ever again, then their skill is useless and we can't see them perform it.