Probably not as big a deal for them since they ARE Top Gun and all ...I also heard that these cheerleaders from Top Gun bought like 10k followers...
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Probably not as big a deal for them since they ARE Top Gun and all ...I also heard that these cheerleaders from Top Gun bought like 10k followers...
Has anyone listed outsiders and critics trying to dictate what cheerleaders should look like and dress like and what moves are appropriate instead of letting the athletes be mature enough to handle these decisions themselves?
I wonder because competitive cheer is one activity where everyone, and I mean everyone, is a critic.
I don't have any problem with rules of dress and conduct, and i think our society indeed has a duty and obligation to set rules of conduct for people that they deem to be not legally full grown adults. the issue is that everyone, including those who know nothing about competitive cheer, try and decide what the athletes should look like and what their performances should be like. And make judgements about them while knowing nothing about that they do, what they are passionate about and the reasons why they do this. I mean, come on, I am sure competitive cheerleaders here could flood this forum with stories about this all day along.When you have the VAST majority of said athletes being minors, under the age of 18, sorry but you're going to have rules of dress and conduct. Minors don't get to decide what moves are ok in a routine otherwise it would be one big ugly twerk-fest. ;)
Honestly, if I had to, the routine would be super clean and not sexual at all.For the competitive cheerleaders here, at high school, all star and collegiate level, maybe you can tell me; if the athletes had at least significant influence in determining what is ok for their routines, would it all be hyper sexualized dancing and Vegas Stripper and Miley Cyrus routines? I am sure a portion of it would be, but would other athletes be able to decide on their own that they have more class and character than that or was I indeed being delusional in assuming they would?
Great. Do you think other cheerleaders at the All Star, High School and NCA and UCA collegiate levels would choreograph them the same way you do?Honestly, if I had to, the routine would be super clean and not sexual at all.
Most of the girls I know would be the same way or similar.Great. Do you think other cheerleaders at the All Star, High School and NCA and UCA collegiate levels would choreograph them the same way you do?
For the competitive cheerleaders here, at high school, all star and collegiate level, maybe you can tell me; if the athletes had at least significant influence in determining what is ok for their routines, would it all be hyper sexualized dancing and Vegas Stripper and Miley Cyrus routines? I am sure a portion of it would be, but would other athletes be able to decide on their own that they have more class and character than that or was I indeed being delusional in assuming they would?
That's a very high percentage you've stated there. While I agree this exists to say that many gyms place 85% of their teams at the level below they should just so they can "win" is inaccurate and insulting.It annoys me soooo much how teams use 85% of their teams to compete in the level below so they can "win". Also when they put it in everyones face and have terrible sportsmanship. BEYOND IRRITATING.
That's a very high percentage you've stated there. While I agree this exists to say that many gyms place 85% of their teams at the level below they should just so they can "win" is inaccurate and insulting.
Because I don't believe that 85% of the teams at gyms place their athletes on lower level teams than their skills warrant for the sole purpose of winning. To me that implies that most gyms are purposely sandbagging, and I feel that is insulting to the majority of the gyms who do not do this. I have found that many gyms actually do the opposite; that is, advance their athletes to a higher team too quickly and not enough of the team has the solid skills at that level to be competitive.Can you explain why you think it is inaccurate and insulting?
Because I don't believe that 85% of the teams at gyms place their athletes on lower level teams than their skills warrant for the sole purpose of winning. To me that implies that most gyms are purposely sandbagging, and I feel that is insulting to the majority of the gyms who do not do this. I have found that many gyms actually do the opposite; that is, advance their athletes to a higher team too quickly and not enough of the team has the solid skills at that level to be competitive.
Why did you chose that high percentage - is it from personal experience?
The Fierce Board App! || iPhone || Android || Upgrade Your Account!