- Dec 13, 2011
- 12
- 4
I noticed that too! You could hardly see the back half of the stage! :confused:does the lighting seem really dark to anyone else on stage?
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
I noticed that too! You could hardly see the back half of the stage! :confused:does the lighting seem really dark to anyone else on stage?
A lot of boys aged out/left and I believe some girls did as well. I know of a few returners this season so I can't say they lost a TON of athletes.Did Flyers lose a lot of athletes? They seem like a new-ish team.
ETA: I still don't understand why people say they're not impressed with Smoed this season. I'm not a fan of their cocky attitudes either, but that routine looks insanely difficult. The only thing I don't like is the dance.
Who got a bid that didn't make the final six?i dont think people were questioning who got the bids. they were questioning why those chosen for bids dont have to make the super six. it can make making the super six kind of pointless, since a teams participation in the super six can just be just for show and not count for or go towards anything (i think thats it, if im understanding this comp right) other than being able to participate in this picture...
![]()
ca sexy six got the at large bidWho got a bid that didn't make the final six?
I feel like the lighting was so bad and all the formations looked off almost like the kids could not see the lines on the floor, I have so much to say after watching all 6 teams, but i will reserve myself.
I guess I just didn't get it, I saw a lot of really bad technique, sub par skills, restricted 5 tumbling in worlds teams, teams trying to be 'creative' but looking a hot mess, spacing was awful, not on all teams, too much stomping, not enough reason for it and a whole lot of sexy time I will never get back. I am getting old. Nothing will ever replace solid technique in my book, if you have the skills no need for all the fluff, many teams hide what they dont have by pole dancing moves and stomping on the floor like they just threw a standing double...no thanks....just show me your true worlds 5 skills. I like cookies.
I think that it's the 2 at large bids for each paid bid that throws things off this year. In the past there were 2 paid and 6 at large so everyone in super 6 got a bid plus 2 teams not included in super 6 got an at large as well.After watching the video of super six, I think Smoed and Ops were definitely deserving. Still confused on the point of having "super six" if you're not giving bids to those teams. In the past, it's always been if you made super six, you were at least walking away with an at large and were competing again for paid. I'd be disappointed to perform for a third time and not receive a bid.
I'm excited to compete against Cali's io6.
does the lighting seem really dark to anyone else on stage?
If I remember correctly they've done that annoying feature every year (& by every year I mean, the last 5 years when I competed there)During the Super Six performances they turned off all the audience lighting. So we were sitting in the dark. That added to the darkness on the stage.
i dont think people were questioning who got the bids. they were questioning why those chosen for bids dont have to make the super six. it can make making the super six kind of pointless, since a teams participation in the super six can just be just for show and not count for or go towards anything (i think thats it, if im understanding this comp right) other than being able to participate in this picture...
![]()