- Feb 12, 2011
- 307
- 277
It's no secret I do not like this rule and I've expressed my displeasure with it in other threads about the topic so I will keep it brief here...
I feel that if a gym wants to protect itself from gym hopping athletes at just two of 7 levels then it should be 100% on them. If a gym asked me to sign a document stating my daughter couldn't compete elsewhere that would send up a HUGE red flag about their abilities to retain athletes.
Maybe I'm biased but I feel gym owners do not need to be protected, athletes do!
I feel that if a gym wants to protect itself from gym hopping athletes at just two of 7 levels then it should be 100% on them. If a gym asked me to sign a document stating my daughter couldn't compete elsewhere that would send up a HUGE red flag about their abilities to retain athletes.
Maybe I'm biased but I feel gym owners do not need to be protected, athletes do!