They used the worlds scoresheet. So it is extremely difficult to compare division to division. International weights stunting so much more than senior (as everyone knows). International also weights overall choregoraphy with more total points than senior does as well. Based on Saturdays scores, either of the teams that had paid bids could have had an additional 20 points in deductions, which is more than 6 stunt falls or tumbling busts and 2 bobbles or touch downs and still walked away with a paid bid.
Also, the judges didn't seem to know how to use the scoresheets. Which is the biggest issue of all. When you have judges who are using a scoresheet that has no rubric and haven't judged on it previously, there will be issues.
I will use a very specific example of something that was inconsistent in synchronized tumbling.
Team A - 13 team members
- 7 athletes go. 4 athletes throw roundoff handspring fulls, and 3 throw layouts
- 2 athletes do front walkover through to full
- 2 athletes do front walkover through to full
Team B- 22 athletes
- 3 athletes go. 2 throw roundoff handspring full, 1 throws a layout
- 2 athletes throw roundoff handspring tuck.
Team A scored a 1.5/10 on day 1 in sync and a 1.0/10 day 2 in sync
Team B scored a 2.5/10 both days in sync.
To me, there is no way to justify that. Team A threw majority in-level sync passes (8/13). Team B threw barely any (2/22) in-level sync passes.
Another thing I heard from this competition. A coach was told by the score rep that their pyramid was amazing and there was almost nothing they could do to improve it, yet scored only just over 50% of the possible difficulty points.