I'm not saying he is innocent, but I'm not saying he's guilty either. What I am saying is I know exactly nothing about the actual evidence in the case and until that evidence has been vetted in a court of law it's not my place to pass judgement.
And this is what scares me about becoming a teacher. The moment I become a teacher is the moment that everyone who isn't a close friend or family gets deleted from facebook. Make one kid mad and they can ruin your career by crying wolf. It doesn't matter if you do any wrong or not you automatically become a criminal and most likely will never have a job again.
And for your lack of a private or personal life you can be rewarded with a paycheck that can qualify you for food stamps and be vilified in the court of public opinion for not being able to (in 6 hours) overcome the life they're subjected to for the other 18.
*Hug* (which I almost typed 'Hugh' #beenTHATkindaday)
Well, the issue with a background check is that you have to have a dynamic system in place. It's one thing to do background checks before you hire people, but who's to say they don't do something two years later as your faithful employee. Depending what it is, that kind of thing can fly under a radar depending on the size Of your organization. Then you have the uncomfortable position of having "cleared" someone through your protocols that is now an issue.
THAT'S something you need. Something more proactive then just a basic check. 'Cause what good is THAT if nothing's happened that they know about?Well, the issue with a background check is that you have to have a dynamic system in place. It's one thing to do background checks before you hire people, but who's to say they don't do something two years later as your faithful employee. Depending what it is, that kind of thing can fly under a radar depending on the size I tour organization. Then you have the uncomfortable position of having "cleared" someone through your protocols that is now an issue.
Our school system had this concern with cleared "volunteers." We moved to a system that does background checks but also checks national criminal databases each night against those names and will flag them immediately if something happened on the weekend you wouldn't ever know about.
A friend of mine from college (NCState) wrote that programming and owns his own software company who our system contracted with....and he drives a much nicer car than me
Well, the issue with a background check is that you have to have a dynamic system in place. It's one thing to do background checks before you hire people, but who's to say they don't do something two years later as your faithful employee. Depending what it is, that kind of thing can fly under a radar depending on the size Of your organization. Then you have the uncomfortable position of having "cleared" someone through your protocols that is now an issue.
Our school system had this concern with cleared "volunteers." We moved to a system that does background checks but also checks national criminal databases each night against those names and will flag them immediately if something happened on the weekend you wouldn't ever know about.
A friend of mine from college (NCState) wrote that programming and owns his own software company who our system contracted with....and he drives a much nicer car than me
I'm sure Mark can adjust or rewrite programming in any matter necessary. He specializes in large scale database programs. If we HAD a unified governing body it would be ideal for member gyms to subscribe yet have said organization as the clearinghouse. Then you could flag gym hopping coaches too. But alas..... That whole unified governing body thing is an entirely different thread (or like 12 threads).
The police had enough evidence to arrest him. He was fired in June and arrested the end of November. The police must have been pretty thorough in their investigations.
