- May 13, 2014
- 7,081
- 11,625
This is a very good first step and one that definitely protects the child and the EP (liability) from a sexual assault occurring while at a competition...BUT...the reality is that a sexual predator will groom and assault a victim by building trust with their coaching position. The majority of sexual assaults in youth sports (at least those reported) that forced governing bodies to restructure their policies were not single attacks in high profile places but ongoing assaults. If a predator fails the background check to get in a warm up room than why would they get hired where time spent with kids at practice is exponentially greater? And if you think about it, it is a very wise move from USASF. Doesn't is basically say, We aren't letting them in the warm up room as a layer of protection...so why have you HIRED them?
I agree with you on this; however, I have seen cases where people, who have otherwise kept up their normal lie, have snapped and the end is disasterous. Springfield, Missouri had such an incident not that long ago and the man worked at the schools. Of course, this won't help with a background check, but it can/does happen. Also, high profile events with a lot of people can be a good time to catch these types of incidents.
I agree with the hiring part---if you can't pass a background check because of a sex assault/rape, you have no business being in the gym to begin with. Some of the other crimes; DUIs and Vehicular Homicides come to mind, are going to become trickier because they may not be able to get a green light yet aren't a sexual predator/sex offender so are they a danger to children? My guess is that is going to be very individualized on how people feel.