- Jan 3, 2010
- 305
- 238
I think each of your statements has gone beyond just the scope of this thread and maybe it's time to start a new one. Regardless:
1. It is my understanding that the school involved went to the event producer (not the governing body because there is not one for college cheer) and asked to remedy the situation. NCA was asked to investigate, but never had to because CSLB gave up the title. We don't really know what NCAs response would have been. To keep that related to this thread, Bangkok would have to go to the Worlds Committe and say they don't feel right about all this and want to and an investigation should be launched IF GT, TG, or Texas request it to the Disciplinary or International Sanctioning Committees.
2. My understanding is this is not an issue of illegal team members, it's improper rostering. Just trying to keep that straight. (were the team members not eligible to compete at worlds vs and improperly structured team)
3. There is always debate about sport vs industry. The term is not as important as everyone understanding that there is currently no mistaking everything about this sport is driven by the companies that run it, not the governing body. The governing body has been very busy putting out guidelines, but has very little power (in my opinion) because it has poor members hip and very little support form all sides.
You may not like it, but none of this is ubsurd, it's reality.
I don't think any of my statements went beyond the scope of this thread. I appreciate that you want to be a peacemaker and problem solver but your response that basically expecting " transparency" to be released is not in line with a governing body's purpose, is therefore, in my opinion absurd. Governing bodies are set up for the greater good and have a succint purpose. So move onto another topic is your solution?
1. Next USA Cheer has taken claim to the fact that they govern "all things cheer" and that includes suppossedly the collegiate arena. To keep that related to THIS thread, if Bangkok (like CSLB) needs to take responsibility to relinquish, does that mean the team that lost to the blatant violations has no rights, nor do the affiliated members who feel a USA team was wronged. What if Stephen F. Austin turned in the violation? Would it be said "Don't go away mad just go away" because we need the team that violated rules to step up and give it back. Do you think the IOC operates this way?
2. Isn't improper rostering and illegal rostering kinda sorta one in the same? Either way, doesn't the use of either effect the outcome of the competition's true champion? So your point?
3. The governing body has very little power? That in itself, if true by your words, is an issue in itself. Who has the power?
Finally, this is reality. Really? Well apparently the thousands of views say that this REALITY is a NIGHTMARE. So you are right no truth-seekers allowed...lets move on to the next unsolved problem with no ability to solve the problem.