The thing is as much as I enjoy competitive cheerleading at a collegiate level, there is no reason for an AD to want it. What benefits does it offer the university? Bama just showed that winning a cheerleading national title doesn't mean anything to them and there are probably quite a few universities that feel that way. My Alma Mater (Georgia Tech) is now non-competitive without signs of ever going competitive again.
I see a few things happening.
- Ground bounding will start to happen and spread throughout colleges. Varsity will reduce what is legally allowed to happen on the sidelines, but it will only stave off the inevitable. Sideline cheering doesn't require rewinds, baskets, standing fulls, or other things. If all cheerleaders ever did was stand tucks, halves / hands, extensions, straight cradles, and led cheers the crowd wouldn't know the difference. I give that point about 10 years before thats where we are.
- Stunt or NCATA will take off. Lost of universities will make their cheerleading teams just ground bound clubs and allow their female cheerleaders to do one of the two. While STUNT and the NCATA did not cause the shift we are going to see, they are going to speed it up. Having a STUNT or NCATA team that gives you all those female athletes for Title IX is going to become hugely attractive in a couple years when it takes hold.
- international 5/6 is about to grow a lot larger... and I mean a LOT larger. Allstar is producing copious amounts of athletes and with the new rules change to encourage boy stunting we are actually gonna produce male stunters now as well. since the males have no where to go after allstar is done AND IOC6 is now UCA style (and I think IOC5 will eventually go back to being a balanced scoresheet) these divisions are going to get huge. (which is a perfect reason for for my 3 globes given to emerging countries in international and take half to finals solution seen here:
http://fierceboard.com/threads/the-fix-for-international.11904/ )