- Dec 15, 2009
- 4,268
- 5,993
The water is actually much clearer on this than you think, take it from a different perspective. Think of which would be a greater loss, the line of credit to a non-profit or the risk to a very profitable corporation if they do not have a governing body to enforce safety and creating a more positive and stable public/business perception. I'm all for transparency but, in this case, it makes sense that a profitable corporation would want to protect itself and the public/businesses they profit from. Cheer still has an uphill battle in public perception, and insurance companies and facilities for competitions need that reassurance that safety and ethics are a priority, otherwise, everyone in this business stands to lose. I'm not saying they're saints, however, that was actually a very smart business move on their part.
I have to agree with Future on this.
As I look at cheer accross the board-from Rec to College level there are major safety gaps and lapses in risk management that could have been fixed years ago if safety and ethics were the priority over particpation.