TheUltimateFan
Cheer Parent
- Jan 9, 2012
- 722
- 1,514
I need some info. Does anyone know the approximate number of athletes registered with USASF at this time?
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Hahah I know. The quoting on her post was weird and there wasn't much I could do about it through tapatalk on my phone :/I was so confused by her over the top response to you that I went back to look for your original post because I knew her take on it wasn't what I remembered reading.
I have been following this thread and have read the same few posters repeat themselves over and over again. I think you have beat this horse to death and it is time to move on. My take on this is a disgruntled employee started this by calling out a gym, others joined in the finger pointing of another gym and now you all have attacked it from every angle like an angry mob.
The gym owners explained themselves and defended themselves and that is still not enough because you all feel the necessity to call them petty, childish names and defend and deflect the poor sportsmanship that was apparently exhibited by your athletes in Dallas.
Until there is a rule that defines the clear leveling of this sport, stop the drama and stop trying to destroy people that you do not know. Why is is so difficult to believe that their intentions were for the experience? Do you know what their thought processes were at the time they made their decisions to go to UCA, I think not.
If you think these were the only two teams at UCA that were supposedly "sandbagging", I have some swampland in the desert for sale! I have no dog in this fight, but I also think enough is enough. Take it up in another thread and move on already!!
quitthedrama said:however NCA did create a rule, so these teams did compete in violation of NCA's sandbagging policy,
i cant do a backwalkover for my life haha and im on l5Now in this case, even 20 lvl 2's competiting on a lvl 1 doesn't mean those lvl 2 can work those mad lvl one skills. Have you seen a senior lvl 5 kid try to do a back walkover lately? We witnessed this a couple of months ago and it was hilarious!!! Just thought this was funny because of the visual that came into my head ;) (back to the discusssion at hand)
Not sure what teams you are talking about but Rockstar The Who competed 4 times and did not violate NCA's policy.. Just stating the facts
aggie1983 said:I don't think anyone has accused you of violating NCA's new policy. However, many of us believe you absolutely ignored the intent of the policy. I saw y'all for the first time at NCA one day in Atlanta. Absolutely loved the routine by Smashing Pumpkins. From comments I have seen from people more familiar with your gym, you have an excellent reputation for putting out solid competitive teams. Unfortunately, the decision you made to put together The Who as a level 2 team has hurt that reputation with many regardless of your stated reasons for doing so . I will concede that perhaps that isn't fair, but most of us are looking at it from the standpoint of how we would feel if we had a team that ended up competing against yours.
I don't think anyone has accused you of violating NCA's new policy. However, many of us believe you absolutely ignored the intent of the policy. I saw y'all for the first time at NCA one day in Atlanta. Absolutely loved the routine by Smashing Pumpkins. From comments I have seen from people more familiar with your gym, you have an excellent reputation for putting out solid competitive teams. Unfortunately, the decision you made to put together The Who as a level 2 team has hurt that reputation with many regardless of your stated reasons for doing so . I will concede that perhaps that isn't fair, but most of us are looking at it from the standpoint of how we would feel if we had a team that ended up competing against yours.
I'm sorry if I misinterpret this, but it seems the only people who want this dropped are new posters, which I find way too coincidental.I have been following this thread and have read the same few posters repeat themselves over and over again. I think you have beat this horse to death and it is time to move on. My take on this is a disgruntled employee started this by calling out a gym, others joined in the finger pointing of another gym and now you all have attacked it from every angle like an angry mob.
The gym owners explained themselves and defended themselves and that is still not enough because you all feel the necessity to call them petty, childish names and defend and deflect the poor sportsmanship that was apparently exhibited by your athletes in Dallas.
Until there is a rule that defines the clear leveling of this sport, stop the drama and stop trying to destroy people that you do not know. Why is is so difficult to believe that their intentions were for the experience? Do you know what their thought processes were at the time they made their decisions to go to UCA, I think not.
If you think these were the only two teams at UCA that were supposedly "sandbagging", I have some swampland in the desert for sale! I have no dog in this fight, but I also think enough is enough. Take it up in another thread and move on already!!
So what you are saying is that every one of these parents and cheerleaders were warned of the potential consequences of this decision - which surely you and the coaches knew could happen - and they were OK with this? They were willing to be the targets of the looks and comments we saw directed at them at NCA?Fair point however I operate my business based on my customers and not anyone else. I have every coach, 20 parents and athletes who agree with our decision. At the end of the day I have my business to operate and be concerned with. As long as my customers are happy then I'm happy. Everyone involved in this decision felt is was the right one for us.
I'm sorry if I misinterpret this, but it seems the only people who want this dropped are new posters, which I find way too coincidental.
Whether individual posters stop calling out a program is their freedom of choice - and not yours. Where I agree with your position is that perhaps it is time to move on. But not to move on and forget this happened, but move to stop it from happening again.
Exactly my point...an assumption was made here that is completely false....new poster does not equal new to Fierce Boards.
So again, I ask you all to stop trashing someone's reputation because you do not like actions that you deem unethical, but are within the rules. So you all do not agree, that is your right, you have stated it, so now stop the negativity.
I do not always agree with what others post, say, or do either. Your point has been made, and again, time to move on.Turn the negativity into something positive and constructive and make a real difference........
The programs that did this will live with the stain on their reputation for a long time. There was nothing ethical or sportsmanlike about this. The decision-makers certainly could not have been blind to the potential for getting ripped apart by their peers who look outside of self-gratification and toward the long term health and image of the sport they love and respect.