- Jan 20, 2010
- 5,666
- 9,254
Well you have database access, no? If you really wanted to, you could see the content of private messages. I can't imagine they're encrypted. But you're probably the only person who could see.
DON'T LURK... Join The Discussion!
Members can REMOVE the ads for FREE... join today!
Well you have database access, no? If you really wanted to, you could see the content of private messages. I can't imagine they're encrypted. But you're probably the only person who could see.
- Dec 4, 2009
- 14,108
- 19,303
Thats a DB question. Your DB count goes up when you post for posts. Unless you meet the requirements to see certain posts, you wont make it. Does that make sense?
- Dec 4, 2009
- 14,108
- 19,303
The thing that ties them together are encrypted. They have some key when it comes to PMs. TBH I havent spent that much time on it.
cheercurl
Cheer Parent
- Dec 14, 2009
- 2,025
- 3,193
This is my big problem with this whole thread...we are all commenting on what we heard...when I said my truth, may not be your truth, may not be her truth,...I wasn't kidding. Some of the versions I have heard are umm...astonishing. Your truth is obviously VERY different than Mamarazzi 's truth.
- Jan 20, 2010
- 5,666
- 9,254
Whoops. You already replied!
- Dec 4, 2009
- 14,108
- 19,303
No one else has the ability to access them directly. However people screen shot the heck out of their conversations.
- Feb 18, 2011
- 2,236
- 3,892
Not really, but I don't really care whether you read my PM's or not. I think what threw me was when you made the comment about not feeling like going through PM's as it felt invasive. It gave me the impression that you could, but didn't. Then, when the other person started posting SQL stuff, it just bugged me out that they potentially knew how to get in there and see stuff.
- Dec 15, 2009
- 4,268
- 5,993
Ahh, another rumor thread, and somehow I am not surprised at the origin.
- Dec 15, 2009
- 4,268
- 5,993
and more than likely the biggest rumor spreader around. Some of these cheer info sources really disappoint me when others are trying to legitimize the sport.
Sadly, this is very true. Not just a feeling.
- Mar 16, 2011
- 5,591
- 21,171
Is it inaccurate that one can choose their level of privacy on a PM with those check-box things? And if they're not checked, it's not-so-private?
- Mar 30, 2012
- 810
- 1,116
On a moral level, I completely agree. And I'm all for total accountability on both sides. I also think the EPS do subsequent damage to the sport by failing to enforce consequences.
All I'm saying is that on a practical level, when the EP accepts money from all of the teams that register with them, they are entering into a contract with each of the teams. And while each team agrees to abide by the rules, the EP contracts with each and every team that they will provide a certain service, which is presumably a fair and equal competition. When they break this rule, they are esssentially breaking their contract.
As for a code of conduct with teams who compete, I'm all for that...and I hate the entitlement that this situation seems to imply.
- Jul 23, 2010
- 1,513
- 1,372
I keep reading posts in this thread and start thinking I've worked out what's going on, and then I'll read the next post and realise I was wrong and actually have no idea what's happening :rolleyes:
- Oct 19, 2010
- 467
- 1,006
Alright y'all, let's quit beating around a bush and fill the rest of us in. Please? :) haha
- Dec 4, 2009
- 14,108
- 19,303
Well to be completely honest NOTHING on the internet is completely anonymous. If I truly wanted to and spent time I can not lie to you and say it couldn't happen. But it would take a lot of motivation on my part... and I simply don't care enough.
cheercurl
Cheer Parent
- Dec 14, 2009
- 2,025
- 3,193
Excellent question...just sayin'
Similar threads
