- Jan 5, 2011
- 5,960
- 21,288
Gross.
Speaking as someone who's actually taken several college courses on evolutionary biology and psychology, while there are lots of hypotheses for the evolutionary benefit for women's curves (whether it be rear ends, hips, legs, breasts, etc.), there isn't much actual scientific evidence that supports much of any of the claims. A large problem with evolutionary psychology is that it focuses more on looking back and creating plausible-sounding stories to fill in the gaps than on finding actual scientific evidence to support those ideas.
Do you have scientific evidence to refute those ideas? Because there actually is plenty of evidence to support them. And I also have taken several college courses on all sorts of biology and psychology.
First off, I genuinely want to thank you for taking the time to find some actual evidence against my argument. It's a breath of a fresh air.
Part of the problem with relying on Internet definitions is that you don't know who they're being written by, or the motivations for why the author phrased things in a particular manner. I would argue that the internet definitions aren't particularly well thought out, and fail to take into consideration that there are plenty of different styles of twerking. Since twerking is still relatively new to the pop culture scene, people are eager to define it by its controversy; they probably don't feel the need to look at the movements objectively. If the Internet were around in the 50s, I'm sure you would find that the majority of people would define "The Twist" in the same way as people nowadays seem to be defining "The Twerk".
I honestly couldn't care less if Twist and Shout were to ban their athletes from wearing Mickey Mouse socks; how they control their athletes is their prerogative. What does concern me are the arguments that people are using to defend the ban--I felt (and continue to feel) it necessary to point out that it's a problem when arguments are rooted in pure emotion and illegitimate biases rather than objectivity and critical thinking.
Yes, internet definitions are sketchy at best. But the actual dictionary on my desk didn't have twerk in it so I had to work with what I had at my disposal. That being said, the internet does happen to be where the majority of people get their info from nowadays. I'm 40 years old - I've been around for a lot of dances, but I'd say this is one of the few I just can't get on board with. I lived in south Florida in the early 90s, when I was 19-20 years old - I've seen twerking in many forms, long before it got "popular." :eek: None of them were artistic.
I agree about the Twist. Yes, things we used to think of as scandalous are now seen as innocent and normal. I don't actually think this is necessarily a good thing though.
I know you (and someone else but I don't remember who) think twerking didn't come from strippers, but I'm going to argue that it did. Your "historical" source is probably about as valid as mine. My source is life experience, and I'm saying strippers in Atlanta and south Florida in the late 80s and early 90s brought twerking to the US. I don't know for sure who named it or if the history of the actual word twerk came from strippers, but the dance did.
I understand that the argument is that it originally came from African dance. I'm going to go ahead and call bs on that. No one is putting a dance on vine or tumblr or youtube to show off their knowledge of African dance. No stripper at Magic City or in Ft Lauderdale said "Oh, let me show these men my artistic African dance for money!" So try to make it sound historical all you want, but the twerking that you see these kids doing now originated with strippers. To try to make it cute or historical or even just not gross is absurd.
(***To clarify, my extensive knowledge of "dancers" in the south in the 90s does not come from being one. :oops: But I did work for a record label and work with a lot of rappers (sadly no one important). Ergo...lots of...um..."young ladies" involved in my line of work.)