cheermommaRN
Cheer Parent
- Dec 14, 2009
- 3,894
- 9,954
Ok. Wait. First you're concerned about kids that can throw doubles crossing from Y5 to Y5R and accusing them of "sandbagging." Then you say that if there is no Y5, the kids would be on J5 (where I'm assuming the could throw doubles). Then you say that your aversion has always been their little knees.
So is the problem really their knees? In which case we shouldn't even let them compete on J5.
Or is the problem "sandbagging" where kids that can throw doubles are competing in Y5R?
And if we don't let them compete on J5 in order to protect their knees and we don't allow Y5 in order to protect their knees, then they are left with Y5R where we all point and call them cheaters for "sandbagging."
It's two issues. My argument against youth 5 has always been from a medical standpoint, kids this young (9 and under) are not physically built to withstand the pounding of some of the more elite tumbling skills. Growth plates can be fractured, ligaments can be strained, and when you have a 16 year old that has been level 5 most of her cheer career needing ACL surgery...that's not normal. I've met a 21 year old that has been told she may need a double knee replacement and was told she has the knees of a 60 year old. Is that really where we want our kids to be?
I have also been a part of this horse and pony show for long enough to know that cheer parents like winning. They also like their kids to be on the highest level possible, sometimes even if their child doesn't have the skills to be there. The handful of kids that are young and do double will get put on a level 5 team unless we ban all level 5 divisions under Senior (which I'm not suggesting). There are a handful of very talented kids in this country that can benefit from a level 5 team, just like there is a handful of talented gymnasts that benefit from TOPS and up training. On the other hand there is a larger percentage of kids that are being hurried through the progressions because they are quick learners and placed on these Youth 5 teams. Having a Y5R gives the kids that need time to progress slower a place to compete. But like I said I am a realist and know that some parents out there would freak the freak out if they were told their child who has been on a Y5 for a year or more will now be restricted on their tumbling. You can't win every battle but you can make changes to protect as many kid's physical health as possible.
Also I didn't accuse anyone of "sandbagging" what I said was that I was worried that this could be the outcome of having two divisions since Senior Open has had the same complaint since it was introduced. And honestly can anyone on this board say that some gym out there would not do this?