Unfortunately, this is already staring to blow up on my Facebook timeline.
To me the worst part is that it seems this poor girl has been lead to believe, by her coaches, that she is the reason they didn't win. The news and cheer world are watching her drop a sign over and over again. And Ravenwoods title is being questioned, instead of celebrated. They don't deserve to have another teams coach to tarnish their win.
The reality is, while Scott County was really good, they don't come close to the difficultly range of Ravenwood. It was posted after the article that they scored a 6.5 in stunt difficulty, but a 9 the day before. If you watch only them, then 6.5 seems low. If you watch Ravenwood, then there is a huge difference between the difficulty and that has to be rewarded somehow. If there's only 10 points to give total, then how do you justify giving Scott Co a 9? That gives 1 point extra to reward Ravenwood, when there is a much bigger gap there in difficulty than 1 point. It's not allstars. There's no range or rubric, it's comparative to the other teams you're competing against. Ravenwood went before Scott Co in finals. Any judge on a comparative system wouldn't score Scott Co's difficulty at a 9 after watching Ravenwood come out and do what they did. What if they only gave Ravenwood a 9 for all of their stunts? Scott Co then couldn't get a 9 too for doing much less. My guess is if they did score a 9 the day before, then they probably went before Ravenwood (I'll have to dig my schedule out to see who went first.)
I highly doubt UCA verbally said they were actually the winners, but they won't change it. I've been at that judges stand to petition things. I don't think UCA would say those words to anyone, true or not, if for no other reason than to cover their own. It's all heresay at this point, from a clearly upset, salty coach. It's hard to take it as credible when a grown adult, who is supposed to set an example, wines to the press about not getting their way.